From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9f89faeb8f41ad0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: ifdef replacement for GNAT Date: 1998/04/11 Message-ID: <1998Apr11.065411.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 343041474 References: <352287EE.1CFB@tolstoy.mdc.com> <352B8208.41C6@tolstoy.mdc.com> <86g1jm2gcf.fsf@zappa> Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org X-Trace: news.decus.org 892292056 14777 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2] Organization: LJK Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-04-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > The proper approach for achieving target dependence is to follow two steps > > (a) encapsulte the target dependence down to the minimum level > > (b) Provide separate target dependent units for these remaining functions So is the build variance then done by maintaining multiple control files for your "Make" utility, or do you have a tool to generate those on the fly? (I realize one might be able to learn this by studying GNAT source, but I am looking for an easy answer. I promise it is not homework from a class :-). Larry Kilgallen