From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, LOTS_OF_MONEY,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,984e922902f4f4ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Can Ada by popularized faster ? Date: 1997/10/25 Message-ID: <1997Oct25.170004.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 284955513 References: <3446D9AB.3A14@erols.com> <3451A98F.B3DFF971@sd.aonix.com> Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org X-Trace: news.decus.org 877813207 10145 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2] Organization: LJK Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-10-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3451A98F.B3DFF971@sd.aonix.com>, Dave Wood writes: > William A Whitaker wrote: >> >> Somewhere on this thread someone suggested that Ada needed a "killer >> application" and that an operating system would be a case in point (like >> C -> UNIX). > > This seems easy to counter-argue. Here are a couple > of examples: > 3. VMS was written in (I think) BLISS. VAX/VMS was > quite dominant for a time. Who the hell has ever > heard of or cared about BLISS on any significant > level? VMS was about 50 % in VAX Macro assembler language (good for what it does but hardly useful on another system) with the rest in Bliss. There are a few further lessons, though -- initially DEC would not sell a Bliss compiler to customers with support at all -- you got one unsupported and "free" with your $25,000 purchase of a source code license for VMS. If you wrote some software of your own and it did not compile, tough. Subsequently DEC had a fairly uniform price for all their compilers, and they offered Bliss at twice that price !!! A couple of years ago DEC decided to withdraw the product and now Bliss is available for VAX VMS and Alpha VMS on the Freeware Disc. Much as I hate to admit it, Dave, this does point out the need for wise Product Management :-) > Ada will never be C because, well, Ada is not C. > It shares C's power and utility, but not its > essential bithead/ hacker characteristics. On > the other hand, Ada's essential characteristics > can provide a competitive edge to the brave and > wise minority who choose to use it. > > I don't think that's such a bad thing. I don't think it would be a bad idea if careful design capabilities were a majority interest. But meanwhile please spread your own product to Windows NT Alpha :-) > -- Dave Wood > -- Product Manager, ObjectAda for Windows Larry Kilgallen