From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,eb420f872d7f3049
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Boolean array representation question
Date: 1997/11/24
Message-ID: <1997Nov24.064612.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 292132251
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org
References: <EK033F.9ps@sd.aonix.com>
 <880170219.81snx@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl>
 <mheaney-ya023680002211970030030001@news.ni.net>
 <6580q9$4p1$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 880371977 7763 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-11-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <6580q9$4p1$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl>, Geert Bosch <geert@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl> writes:

> This still misses the point, I'm afraid. Components of an array
> (unpacked) must be independently addressable, so different elements
> of the same array can be concurrently accessed without one task
> affecting the other.

So which is it, independently addressable or independently accessible ?
On an Alpha 21064 these are different values - 8 bits vs 32 bits.

Larry Kilgallen