From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,501d9c77c1452627
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,501d9c77c1452627
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: IDE/Rational Apex
Date: 1997/11/11
Message-ID: <1997Nov11.065650.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 288569911
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org
References: <EJGAop.EAK@syd.csa.com.au>
X-Trace: news.decus.org 879249415 15746 KILGALLEN [192.67.173.2]
Organization: LJK Software
Reply-To: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-11-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <EJGAop.EAK@syd.csa.com.au>, damiano@syd.csa.com.au (Damian O'Neill) writes:

> A couple of days ago I requested opinions
> on IDE's in general and Rational Apex in
> particular (thanks again to all responants).
> I was completely underwhelmed by positive
> responses. So if anyone has anything good
> to say about Apex or IDE's in general,
> I'd love to hear it.

I don't intend to pollute comp.lang.ada with my opinions about the
best IDE I have seen, since it has nothing to do with Ada.

As for Apex in particular, please remember that this is Tri-Ada
week and those with Apex experience are off determining whether
the software used to design the Arch was safe :-).

Larry Kilgallen