From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8947310381c2a3f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: BSAFE Bindings for Ada (was: Ada & Encryption / Compression) Date: 1997/03/06 Message-ID: <1997Mar6.170644.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 223635581 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: <5fikh7$ras$1@nargun.cc.uq.edu.au> <1997Mar6.123219.1@eisner> <5fn9fu$r04@portal.gmu.edu> X-Nntp-Posting-User: KILGALLEN X-Trace: 857686038/15537 Organization: LJK Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <5fn9fu$r04@portal.gmu.edu>, wpritche@osf1.gmu.edu (William W Pritchett) writes: > Larry Kilgallen (kilgallen@eisner.decus.org) wrote: > > : In my opinion calling RSA's BSAFE toolkit from Ada is much nicer > : than calling it from C. Of course I might say that about a lot > : of toolkits, but even though it is written in C, BSAFE avoids > : such C-isms as null-terminated strings. > > I have a requirement to use BSafe with Ada and was wondering if anyone > has done an Ada 95 binding to the product. It may be that our OEM agreement with RSA prohibits sharing that, but perhaps something could be worked out for me to mail bindings to your RSA sales representative for passing on to you. But those would be Ada 83 bindings, possibly requiring platform- specific tuning. Send mail if there is possible future interest and I will ensure there is a "presentable" set of bindings ready for transfer. Larry Kilgallen