From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8335f7ca87d8a578 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Cygwin.dll and win32 stuff - windowing portability Date: 1997/03/24 Message-ID: <1997Mar24.131150.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 228046822 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: <01bc33be$d9e1fbc0$3f2b18ce@elbier.ezl.com> <01bc37e5$82184b80$a6fa82c1@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> <1997Mar24.082615.1@eisner> X-Nntp-Posting-User: KILGALLEN X-Trace: 859227114/4120 Organization: LJK Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > Larry said > > < feature when purchasing Macintosh software. If the typical customer > for your application domain has adopted this attitude they will not > be satisfied by less.>> > > Sure I understand this, but realistically, it is going to be more and > more the case that the *only* way that applications will arrive on the > Mac is in some reasonably portable cross-platform form. We have all seen > the trend of developers being reluctant to invest much special effort > on the Mac, and that trend is pretty much bound to continue I fear! Although I disagree with that, it is immaterial. If I knew as much about OS/2 as I do about the Macintosh, I could probably come up with some equally non-portable concept. As for X-Windows, consider the new CDE support for preserving windowing system state on logout. There are other GUI environments which lack such a concept. How many present cross-GUI tools support that feature? Larry