From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,257bb1c458aacca7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Ada IDE for Win 95 Date: 1997/03/15 Message-ID: <1997Mar15.073807.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 225715059 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: <332A3A2B.57B2@mad.scientist.com> X-Nntp-Posting-User: KILGALLEN X-Trace: 858429494/3829 Organization: LJK Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-03-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <332A3A2B.57B2@mad.scientist.com>, John Breen writes: > > I am a uni student forced to use Ada by my uni. Not my choice, I > can assure you. >
I gather you are also forced to use an HTML editor to post to a plain text discussion channel. >
What I don't understand is why I should use command-line based tools like > GNAT when there surely must be a windows 95 IDE for Ada 95 (even if it > is only a front end for GNAT) around. >
A reasonably independent listing of such tools is available from http://www.adahome.com/ in your native editor environment. >
Does anyone know of such a thing? I would prefer one that is free. Some are free and some cost money. But since we have you here, which are the free IDEs for your chosen non-Ada languages and how would you rate their quality? My own experience with non-Ada IDEs has been with those that cost money, and knowing about the others would be useful. Larry Kilgallen (remaining HTML-droppings omitted)