From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a5681531ca1cf09e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: mrose@nswc.navy.mil (Mike Rose) Subject: Tasking performance between Ada83 and Ada95 Date: 1997/06/06 Message-ID: <1997Jun6.115223.7384@relay.nswc.navy.mil>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 246531741 Sender: mrose@suntzu (Mike Rose) Organization: NSWCDD - K72 Reply-To: user@machine.domain Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I am checking the performance between Ada83 and Ada95 using the Tasking Benchmarks written by Thomas Burger from the PAL. The Compilers I'm using are for Ada95 - GNAT v3.07 and for Ada83 - Alsys Adaworld v5.5.4. The operating system is HP UX v10.10. Each test was run with the creation of 500 tasks. In comparing the results between the two compilers, I found that the tasking performance is much slower with GNAT than with Alsys, every test was at least 10 times slower and some were much more. Our software depends heavily on tasking. Is there any way to improve the tasking performance with GNAT ? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Rose NSWC/DD Phone: 540-653-4753 Email: mrose@nswc.navy.mil Disclaimer: The preceeding message was brought to you via myself and in no way reflect the ideas or wishes of the U.S. Navy or the DOD in any way. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------