From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,5de3fcabfe0474f0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Running ADA code compiled for NT/Intel on a NT/Alpha Date: 1997/07/26 Message-ID: <1997Jul26.174411.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 259158979 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eisner.decus.org References: <33da134d.6264788@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> X-Nntp-Posting-User: KILGALLEN X-Trace: 869953454/21792 Organization: LJK Software Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <33da134d.6264788@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>, gfrenoy@ibm.net (Frenoy Ga�tan) writes: > > We have compiled this small thing with 2 different ADA compiler > (VADSself 6.2.1 and ObjectAda 7.0) on a NT/Intel : > Then we've tried to run it on a x86 emulator (FX!32) on a > NT/Alpha machine. > FX!32 Fatal error in process ... > > FX!32 486 emulator forcing process exit: > Unimplemented entire opcode. If it runs on Intel and fails on Alpha (and you are using the latest version of FX!32) DEC would like your trouble report. Larry Kilgallen