From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b5abe19de00b88b4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: Platform independent GUI bindings... Date: 1997/01/27 Message-ID: <1997Jan27.064225.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 212500147 x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org references: <32EC150C.5082@ibm.net> x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN x-trace: 854365356/5666 organization: LJK Software newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-01-27T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <32EC150C.5082@ibm.net>, Marc Bejerano writes: > Does anyone have a recommendation for platform-independent GUI bindings > in Ada95? I need OS/2 PM, Windows, and X11 bindings but I don't want to > have to recode the application for each platform. Any help and/or ideas > would be MOST helpful as I really do NOT want to write one myself. How about IBM VisualAge ? The demo that OC Systems had for their Ada add-on at TRI-Ada showed what one would expect to be a Windows NT tabbed dialog box with an appearance resembling an OS/2 property sheet, but you must accept those little nits when you decide that you are not willing to code separately for each GUI style. Larry Kilgallen