From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f034f4cba8f609e8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: whitingms@corning.com (whiting_ms@corning.com (Matt Whiting))
Subject: Re: Processors with Ada support.
Date: 1997/01/16
Message-ID: <1997Jan16.142740.1@corning.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 210610590
references: <1997Jan15.144618.1@corning.com>
 <5blge3$bvo@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>
organization: Corning, Incorporated
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
nntp-posting-user: whitingms
Date: 1997-01-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <5blge3$bvo@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>, bowmanc@ns1.sw-eng.falls-church.va.us (Carl Bowman) writes:
> The AdaIC maintains a searchable list of validated Ada compilers.  One
> of the criteria is to search by host or target.  The URL is
> http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/forms/vcl95.shtml for Ada 95
> compilers, and for Ada 83 compilers is
> http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/forms/vcl83.shtml .
> 
-- 

Thanks, that's a good start.  However, I was interested in all of the GNAT
ports (or others) even if they aren't validated.  I recall seeing a list posted
here or available somewhere that listed all of the target processors for which
various people/groups had provided a GNAT port.  I'm guessing few of them were
officially validated and thus aren't on the list referenced above.

Can anyone point me towards the GNAT list?  I'm trying to compare availability
of Ada compilers to availability of C and C++ compilers.  Given that neither of
the latter alternatives are validated (or even standardized in the case of
C++), I don't want to require validation of the Ada compilers at this point
either.  Now prior to actual production use ... is a whole 'nother issue.  I
don't yet need to cross that bridge.  

Matt