From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,45a4fcaf1b409965
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Recommendations, please
Date: 1997/01/14
Message-ID: <1997Jan14.070707.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 209715732
x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org
references: <32df05a8.9685800@news.lander.es>
x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN
x-trace: 853243630/28369
organization: LJK Software
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-01-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <32df05a8.9685800@news.lander.es>, lektu@lander.es (Juanma Barranquero) writes:
> 
> I'm thinking of buying a commercial Ada compiler for Windows 95 (I've
> tasted GNAT and it's too dry for my tastes), and my budget goes only
> to $1,000 - $1,500. Now I know that's the middle-low range, as Ada
> compilers go, but anyway, is there any product I should look to?

The current generation of commercial Ada compilers for Windows 95
seems to be coming out at prices well below those for Unix.  With
your operating system choice, you should be able to follow links
from www.adahome.com to compiler vendors and find that offerings
for Windows 95 are well within your budget.

Larry Kilgallen