From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2e11aa5522d5cc28
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Subject: Re: Mixing Ada and C++. Is a good idea?
Date: 1997/11/24
Message-ID: <199711241513.QAA25078@basement.replay.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 292185895
References: <dewar.880074788@merv> 
Organization: Replay and Company UnLimited
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
X-001: Replay may or may not approve of the content of this posting
X-002: Report misuse of this automated service to <abuse@replay.com>
X-URL: http://www.replay.com/remailer/
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-11-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


On 20 Nov 1997 20:22:02 -0500, dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
wrote:

> 
> Joe Gwinn says
> 
> <<That's what all language folk say, for all languages.
> 
> Details aside, simpler is usually better, for all languages.  I don't
> doubt that some probelms have been solved, but the history of
> inter-language bindings isn't exactly smooth.  Pardon me if I don't
> believe that Ada95 is any different in this.
> 
> Joe Gwinn
> >>
> 
> 
> No, that's plain wrong. 

Sorry, Robert, but we can't call another's beliefs "wrong." Joe can
believe whatever he wants, no matter how contrary to fact it may be.

Jeff Carter  PGP:1024/440FBE21
My real e-mail address: ( carter @ innocon . com )
"Son of a window-dresser."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail

Posted with Spam Hater - see
http://www.compulink.co.uk/~net-services/spam/