From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: scampi@dial.pipex.com (Mathew Hendry) Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/06/02 Message-ID: <19970602.562B58.2B32@ai110.du.pipex.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 245706341 Distribution: world References: <5m57nu$7si@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <5mcp5o$ei7$3@news.cc.ucf.edu> <5md1fl$9f4@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <5mmvgj$61k@squire.cen.brad.ac.uk> Organization: private node Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In comp.lang.c++, dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote: : <> : : I object to this solution. It smacks of searching for Truth with a : capital T. Science is about constructing theories that are consistent : with observations, and which have the capability of predicting the : outcome of observations not yet made. Imagine that you have produced a theory about the movements of the planets, basing it upon Newtonian dynamics. I provide a competing theory, based upon the exploits of invisible crocodiles. The two theories give exactly the same predictions. Given your claim that theories are judged only on their consistency with observations, how do you choose between these two theories? -- Mat.