From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d1df6bc3799debed
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: johnherro@aol.com (John Herro)
Subject: Re: Language Design Mistakes (was "not intended...")
Date: 1997/05/14
Message-ID: <19970514122600.IAA28826@ladder02.news.aol.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 241474815
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
X-Admin: news@aol.com
Date: 1997-05-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) writes:
> There was some push for Ada 9X to allow
> anonymous arrays for record components...

It might be surprising, but that was allowed in the 1980 Ada
standard!  (It was, of course, removed in Ada 83).

- John Herro
Software Innovations Technology
http://members.aol.com/AdaTutor
ftp://members.aol.com/AdaTutor