From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7fdbd80260e672c6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bgaffney42@aol.com (BGaffney42)
Subject: Re: I need more opinions
Date: 1997/01/27
Message-ID: <19970127033601.WAA08382@ladder01.news.aol.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 212444099
references: <5c8g2n$2lt@faatcrl.faa.gov>
organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-admin: news@aol.com
Date: 1997-01-27T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>                                    Add them up/2, you get
>a pretty good figure.  Forget for a minute that the mem on
>one card is useless to the other...

>Anyone have opinions, experience with this New Math?

This sounds a bit like when a defense contractor was having problems
meeting
 their memory reserve numbers.  They proposed to their customer a recovery
 plan which included doubling the memory on the processor, thereby
achieving
 50% reserve memory.  Never mind that the processor had no physical
capability
 to address the added memory ...

                                                      --Bg