From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,78f52dfc9ef24174 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: DEC Ada V3.3 Date: 1996/09/03 Message-ID: <1996Sep3.124414.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 178210271 x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org references: x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN x-trace: 841769058/12979 organization: LJK Software newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-09-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch (Mats Weber) writes: > We have a program approx. 100'000 lines of code that, when compiled with > DEC Ada 3.3, behaves in a strange way, with both /optimize and > /nooptimize: > - raises Constraint_Error in a non reproducible way > - some tasks block for 10 secs to 10 minutes without any apparent reason > - when compiled with /optimize, we get the following message at link time: > "%W, symbol ADA$ADD_ALL$V multiply defined > in module ADD_ALL file > USER2:[PTT_APZV.ADA_OPT.EASYFILE]EZF_US-XX319A799C48DA.OBJ;1" > Do you think it is worth for us to submit the problem to DEC ? Of course! That way it will be fixed before the rest of us run into it. A good reproducer is required, however, in order to speed the resolution. Admittedly the first two are hard to "submit", but the third should reproduce on any machine, right ? DEC fixes bugs in their Ada compiler, but typically only those they have heard about. Larry Kilgallen