From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f05f6c2ca4c91ddd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: long term viability of Ada Date: 1996/09/25 Message-ID: <1996Sep25.080154.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 185239780 x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org references: <96092412370174@psavax.pwfl.com> x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN x-trace: 843652918/5945 organization: LJK Software newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-09-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <96092412370174@psavax.pwfl.com>, "Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93" writes: > Probably the best indicator of long-term viability would be the > number of college level courses being taught which utilize Ada95. > People promote the technology they are most familiar with and as > students emerge from school knowing Ada95, they'll likely sell > their bosses on it. An excellent point. I hereby forgive the academics on the newsgroup for all those posts about "curriculum" which made my eyes glaze over :-) Larry Kilgallen