From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,cd7d510783cb3f76
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Ada 95 - Performance vs. Pervasiveness (was: Executable File Size
 Diff
Date: 1996/10/04
Message-ID: <1996Oct4.094155.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 187517472
x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org
references: <52bmn5$7r0@sjx-ixn6.ix.netcom.com>
 <52bq9m$7gn@nr1.ottawa.istar.net> <324D6631.4F3F@ghgcorp.com>
 <52o1a8$fre@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <DyLoy8.C0u@thomsoft.com>
 <32548F78.5D64@ghgcorp.com>
x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN
x-trace: 844436607/7276
organization: LJK Software
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <32548F78.5D64@ghgcorp.com>, Stanley Allen <sallen@ghgcorp.com> writes:

> Now, is anyone going to publish Ada95 compiler comparisons?

My own preference would be for vendors to spend their time on
porting to additional platforms rather than fighting performance
for uncovered platforms which interest me. To a great extent these
platforms do _not_ overlap those for the other vendors.

> Gentlemen, start your engines...

Gentlemen (and ladies), start your _other_ engines...

Larry Kilgallen