From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d82559111ee5ba
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: ObjectAda Professional GUI Builder
Date: 1996/10/22
Message-ID: <1996Oct22.123601.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 191270552
x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org
references: <01bbbc5d$ac75c3c0$629148a6@cornerstone.kee.aetc.af.mil>
 <Btj3aCAJo9ayIwra@shadebs.demon.co.uk>
x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN
x-trace: 846002165/16976
organization: LJK Software
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <Btj3aCAJo9ayIwra@shadebs.demon.co.uk>, Benjamin Shade <ben@shadebs.demon.co.uk> writes:

> Has anybody used both the old ActiveAda and the new ObjectAda? Is its
> GUI builder any better?

Well the specification and body for each package are both in the
same file, so that would indicate it dates back to before Ada
had separate compilation :-)

Larry Kilgallen