From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,808505c9db7d5613
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: james@cdac.com (James Thiele)
Subject: Re: Looking for good Ada95 book
Date: 1996/11/06
Message-ID: <1996Nov6.232009.7727@ole.cdac.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 194969847
sender: news@ole.cdac.com (Usenet News)
references: <dewar.846952540@merv> <55kmtp$3s3@top.mitre.org>
 <1996Nov4.083416.1@eisner>
organization: Cascade Design Automation, Bellevue, WA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <1996Nov4.083416.1@eisner> kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) writes:
>In article <55kmtp$3s3@top.mitre.org>, mfb@mbunix.mitre.org (Michael F Brenner) writes:
>>     > With Ada 95, we have something approaching a real consensus on style (use
>>     > lower case for keywords and Capitalized_Identifiers_With_Underscores). I
>>     > think this consensus is valuable for the community,
>> 
>> I was not asked what my opinion was before forming this imaginary
[snip]
>
>Although adding underscores is problematic, it seems to me that
>for programs on a computer letting each reader view them with
>their preferred capitalization should be a trivial extension
>to an editor which already does syntax coloring.

And when you print the program, do you use ink and paper which lets
each reader view it with their preferred capitalization?

--
James Thiele
james@cdac.com (work) or jet@eskimo.com (home)
http://www.eskimo.com/~jet