From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8dea6f46dfb95f66
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Environment variables
Date: 1996/11/04
Message-ID: <1996Nov4.104155.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 194334435
x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org
references: <55819q$mql@newslink.runet.edu>
 <ws94tjbhlg1.fsf@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu> <327A0B58.65C4@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <dewar.846951642@merv> <E0B7C4.EEr@world.std.com> <dewar.847053776@merv>
 <327DF7F2.2484@gsfc.nasa.gov>
x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN
x-trace: 847122119/7792
organization: LJK Software
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <327DF7F2.2484@gsfc.nasa.gov>, Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov> writes:

> In any case, as Laurent pointed, out, it IS possible to tell from the
> sources that Ada.Command_Line.Environment is NOT defined by the Ada 95
> RM, which is what I really wanted to know. However, it requires knowing
> what the commenting style is in packages that are defined in the RM. I
> think compiler-provided packages that are NOT defined by the RM should
> be more clearly labeled as such, to make it easier to know when we are
> being non-portable.

Presumably most such packages would not be so intertwined as to require
that they be a child package of Ada.

Larry Kilgallen