From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,dad65365cb2b3396 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,dad65365cb2b3396 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,dad65365cb2b3396 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,dad65365cb2b3396 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen) Subject: Re: The disturbing myth of Eiffel portability Date: 1996/11/20 Message-ID: <1996Nov20.065345.1@eisner>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 197627724 x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org references: <3294e64b.74799475@news2.ibm.net> <56t1m4$nis@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN x-trace: 848490830/20147 organization: LJK Software newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1996-11-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > This *huge* performance hit occurs on fewer and fewer machines, nearly all > machines now support IEEE arithmetic, and the decision to require this > semantis in Java represents a final nail in the coffin for weird (and often > badly designed) non-IEEE arithmetic systems. To be fair, many of the machines whose native floating point arithmetic is non-IEEE were designed before the IEEE standard. Manufacturers also owe some continuity to their existing customers. Larry Kilgallen