From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,701d3ed4f915aaf8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tannen@dudley.geg.mot.com (David Tannen) Subject: Re: Tasks vs Task Types Date: 1996/05/08 Message-ID: <1996May8.143942.22191@schbbs.mot.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 153756782 sender: news@schbbs.mot.com (SCHBBS News Account) references: <4mnra4$qc6@gde.GDEsystems.COM> organization: Motorola GSTG, Scottsdale, AZ reply-to: tannen@dudley.geg.mot.com newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article qc6@gde.GDEsystems.COM, Michael Levasseur writes: > What is the difference between Tasks and Task Types? You can instantiate a generic w/ a task type but not with a task 8-). (Think of the possibilities - link list of tasks ). > > This relates to Pragma Priority and Size clauses. But seriously, you have hit on the reason to do task types. If you need to adjust the size or priority I think the only way you can do this is w/ a task type. In fact, I am now in the habit of making all my tasks task types so that I can 'fine tune' the size. David Tannen (tannen@dudley.geg.mot.com) Motorola, Scottsdale (602) 675-1074 m/s H1119 Member of TCCCS/Iris, TeamAda, and TeamOS/2 Christian Acronyms: B.I.B.L.E.=Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth