From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,56d944aeed1e3792
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: DEC Ada on DEC Unix
Date: 1996/03/19
Message-ID: <1996Mar18.205521.1@eisner.decus.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 143057840
x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org
references: <9603151509.AA01824@eight-ball> <314D7065.40CF@lfwc.lockheed.com>
x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN
organization: LJK Software
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-03-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <314D7065.40CF@lfwc.lockheed.com>, "Byron B. Kauffman" <KauffmanBB@lfwc.lockheed.com> writes:

> I've been doing the Ada thing for about 8 years or so, with 6 or 7 of
> the 8 years spent working on DEC/VMS/Open VMS development systems for
> VAX and 68040 targets, with the remainder (and currently) being in UNIX
> environments - Harris HAPSE and SGI/VERDIX, to be exact. 

> My current situation is that are currently porting an EXTREMLY large
> piece of Ada (~4000 program units) to an SGI machine. Here's my
> "rhetorical" question - why can't the UNIX Ada development systems (with
> the obvious exception of the Rational Rose/APEX/etc. products) come up
> with something as good as DEC's?

So how does DEC Ada do on DEC Unix ?

Supposedly it is comes from the same code base.