From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9cb6352457d1c6de
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: is there a 'wait' command in Ada
Date: 1996/12/03
Message-ID: <1996Dec3.072025.1@eisner>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 202081979
x-nntp-posting-host: eisner.decus.org
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.961129204410.12801A-100000@sirius>
 <m2hgm4vnzz.fsf@metronet.com>
x-nntp-posting-user: KILGALLEN
x-trace: 849615629/29047
organization: LJK Software
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <m2hgm4vnzz.fsf@metronet.com>, Corey Minyard <minyard@metronet.com> writes:

> This has bugged me since I started using GNAT.  If you use a delay,
> you get a multi-threaded application.  There is no way around it that
> I have found.  It is not a debugger issue (although a multi-threaded
> debugger would be useful).

If the debugger in question cannot deal with threads, that still
seems to me to be a debugger issue.  I thought I read from Mike's
comment that a correct program would run alright unless the
debugger is introduced.

Larry Kilgallen