From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e319e5c34bce720,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: John Walker <walkerj@SW-ENG.FALLS-CHURCH.VA.US>
Subject: comparative 83-95 productivity?
Date: 1996/12/20
Message-ID: <199612201711.RAA08802@sw-eng.falls-church.va.us>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 205154845
sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@LISTSERV.NODAK.EDU>
comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Does anyone have any comparative productivity figures for
Ada 83 versus Ada 95 in terms of lines of code produced
per time, etc., etc.?

Basically, I'm starting to get questions in the area, and
I've started to update my current files.  I'll be
searching the Web, previous c.l.a posts, etc., so
apologies if you've already posted data several times. :)

By the way, I don't mind receiving duplicative info. :)
Data can be tentative, not-for-attribution, anecdotal,
partially remembered references, etc., as well as
published studies, etc.

Thanks!

John

John Walker        walkerj@sw-eng.falls-church.va.us
AdaIC, 800/232-4211, 703/681-2466, fax: 703/681-2869
direct dial: 703/681-2472               (DSN: 761- )