From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,808505c9db7d5613 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: lars.farm@ite.mh.se (Lars Farm) Subject: Re: Looking for good Ada95 book Date: 1996/11/12 Message-ID: <199611121842172247819@dialup110-1-9.swipnet.se>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 196028385 references: <32723F6A.54A3@dtek.chalmers.se> <32750568.123@essi.fr> <01bbc5d8$a3b24e00$6a9148a6@cornerstone.mydomain.org> <55955a$n04@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <563ikc$ipl@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <19961110155556618957@dialup102-5-9.swipnet.se> <199611111501281395400@dialup81-4-2.swipnet.se> organization: pv nntp-posting-user: s-49817 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-11-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > As for putting up with differing styles, no, I won't. If anyone at > ACT insisted on using their own idiosyncratic style, I would tell > them they were welcome to do so elsewhere. I agree. Different scopes. Organization and every user. When I say "allow different styles", I mean the larger scope. One project / organization / person should not impose its own preferred style on other unrelated organizations / persons. I do not mean that you should accept anything within a project / organization. I can't see how my message could be interpreted like that. I said: > if there is a style guide for an employer or a project, I'll use it > because it's their money and the code I write is their code so they > should have their style. With the little English I know, this seems pretty clear. Perhaps my English isn't good enough? -- Lars Farm, lars.farm@ite.mh.se