From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a236155f75e58a6d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Jean-Pierre Rosen <rosen@EMAIL.ENST.FR>
Subject: Re: Visibility of packages in child bodies...
Date: 1996/04/17
Message-ID: <199604171601.SAA22336@email.enst.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 148004557
sender: Ada programming language <INFO-ADA@VM1.NoDak.EDU>
x-sender: rosen@email.enst.fr
comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
x-mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Date: 1996-04-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

At 05:17 17/04/1996 GMT, you wrote:
>If a series of library packages are created as...
>
>        package useful is...
>
>        package a is...
>
>        package a.useful is...
>
>then in the package body of a.useful is it possible to
>refer to package "useful" without using a library level renaming?
>
>e.g. in the following...
>
>        with useful;
>
>        package body a.useful is...
>
>package "useful" is not directly visible.
>
>
with Standard.Useful;

should do the trick. All library packages are children of Standard.
+------------------------------------o-------------------------------------+
| P-mail:                            | E-mail: rosen@enst.fr               |
|   ADALOG - 27 avenue de Verdun     |    Tel: +33 1 46 45 51 12           |
|   92170 Vanves - FRANCE            |    Fax: +33 1 46 45 52 49           |
+------------------------------------o-------------------------------------+