From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c86cf2332cbe682
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-20 10:13:29 PST
Path: 
 pad-thai.cam.ov.com!noc.near.net!chpc.chpc.org!bigboote.WPI.EDU!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!uunet!fdn.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!swidir.switch.ch!epflnews!dinews.epfl.ch!lglsun!nebbe
From: nebbe@lglsun.epfl.ch (Robb Nebbe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
Date: 20 Jan 1995 11:12:51 GMT
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
Sender: nebbe@lglsun3.epfl.ch (Robb Nebbe)
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <1995Jan20.120612@lglsun.epfl.ch>
References: <TARJEIJ.95Jan11183331@ulrik.uio.no> <D29L78.J9@nntpa.cb.att.com>
  <D2MpsE.HyJ@thomsoft.com> <1995Jan19.185316.2225@nbivax.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lglsun3.epfl.ch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 1995-01-20T11:12:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1995Jan19.185316.2225@nbivax.nbi.dk>,
sparre@meyer.fys.ku.dk (Jacob Sparre Andersen) writes:

|> 
|> I agree with KT's suggestion about compiler warnings.
|> Is it allready time to start writing down what to do with Ada0X? Is somebody 
|> making a (mental) note of this problem for the '0X team, and where should 
|> such comments be sent?
|> 
|> Regards,
|>                 Jacob Sparre Andersen

There should probably be a section in the programming FAQ about
these cases where the semantics of the language are goofy (if
not outright wrong). If you wrote something up I'm sure Magnus
would include it in the FAQ.

Robb Nebbe