From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,97482af7429a6a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10d15b,97482af7429a6a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d15b,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,97482af7429a6a62 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: rmartin@rcmcon.com (Robert Martin) Subject: Re: C++ not OOP? (Was: Language Efficiency Date: 1995/04/22 Message-ID: <1995Apr22.170914.3920@rcmcon.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 101369016 references: <3mbmd5$s06@icebox.mfltd.co.uk> <3mcfbf$psl@acmez.gatech.edu> <3mgnkc$e3j@atlantis.utmb.edu> <1995Apr13.180317.3308@rcmcon.com> <3muaif$46u@atlantis.utmb.edu> <1995Apr21.181149.6783@rcmcon.com> <3n8so9$lgq@atlantis.utmb.edu> organization: R. C. M. Consulting Inc. 708-918-1004 newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.cobol Date: 1995-04-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Curtis Bass writes: >rmartin@rcmcon.com (Robert Martin) wrote: >-- [post deleted] -- >This is degenerating into testosterone-crazed posturing. Net rule #1,934,512.332 When you don't have any more substance to fling at your opponent, then refer to his/her hormones. >For the record, Grady Booch calls Smalltalk a "pure" OOPL. >Frankly, I prefer to adopt his view of the world rather than >yours. I don't think his point of view and your point of view are very close. He, at least would dicuss the matter with me, and would do me the honor of considering that my point of view was based upon rational thought rather than gonadal reaction. -- Robert Martin | Design Consulting | Training courses offered: Object Mentor Assoc.| rmartin@rcmcon.com | Object Oriented Analysis 2080 Cranbrook Rd. | Tel: (708) 918-1004 | Object Oriented Design Green Oaks IL 60048 | Fax: (708) 918-1023 | C++