From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,a9ec16e88ef2b543
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,a9ec16e88ef2b543
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a7b18e7570ac8dc3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-07 20:09:56 PST
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!udel!MathWorks.Com!yeshua.marcam.com!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!uknet!dmu.ac.uk!grp
From: grp@dmu.ac.uk (Graham Perkins)
Subject: Re: Ada vs. Eiffel
Message-ID: <1994Sep6.134113.16778@dmu.ac.uk>
Organization: De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
References: <34473c$ru5@info2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
 <344isl$brd@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <3450li$t04@disuns2.epfl.ch>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 1994 13:41:13 GMT
Xref: nntp.gmd.de comp.software-eng:17442 comp.lang.eiffel:4032
 comp.lang.ada:14504
Date: 1994-09-06T13:41:13+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3450li$t04@disuns2.epfl.ch> matomira@di.epfl.ch (Fernando Mato Mira) writes:
>Actually, a couple of days ago this question popped up to my mind:
>
>What does Eiffel3 have that Ada9X doesn't? (language only, not tools)

My understanding of Ada9X is that it will have EVERYTHING by the
time it is released as production compilers.  So the answer will
be "nothing".

But not a good question anyway.  Think of Occam's razor and ask
"What does Eiffel omit that Ada doesn't"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>