From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,66253344eaef63db X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,66253344eaef63db X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,66253344eaef63db X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-30 11:58:55 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.lang.c++ Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!overload.lbl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!noc.near.net!ray.com!news.ray.com!swlvx2!jgv From: jgv@swl.msd.ray.com (John Volan) Subject: Re: Mut. Recurs. in Ada9X w/o Breaking Encaps.? (LONG) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 1994 13:30:06 GMT Message-ID: <1994Sep30.133006.27314@swlvx2.msd.ray.com> References: <1994Sep27.165203.9192@swlvx2.msd.ray.com> <1994Sep29.014611.20263@swlvx2.msd.ray.com> <1994Sep29.183749.7489@swlvx2.msd.ray.com> Sender: news@swlvx2.msd.ray.com (NEWS USER) Keywords: Ada 9X, C++, object-oriented, Law of Demeter Organization: Raytheon Company, Tewksbury, MA Xref: bga.com comp.lang.ada:6339 comp.object:6926 comp.lang.c++:31111 Date: 1994-09-30T13:30:06+00:00 List-Id: stt@dsd.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) writes: >No, actally I meant what I wrote ;-). If Y = null, then the conversion >always succeeds, since all (named) access (sub)types include null >as a legal value of the (sub)type. I stand corrected. (Wow, showing your ignorance again, John, huh? :-) >-Tucker Taft stt@inmet.com >Intermetrics, Inc. -- John Volan -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Me : Person := (Name => "John Volan", -- Company => "Raytheon Missile Systems Division", -- E_Mail_Address => "jgv@swl.msd.ray.com", -- Affiliation => "Enthusiastic member of Team Ada!", -- Humorous_Disclaimer => "These opinions are undefined " & -- "by my employer and therefore " & -- "any use of them would be " & -- "totally erroneous."); --------------------------------------------------------------------------------