From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,256d88732296b589 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-28 06:05:09 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ddsw1!panix!MathWorks.Com!news.kei.com!ub!penny!mary!sobi0268 From: sobi0268@mary.cs.fredonia.edu (Kevin V. Sobilo) Subject: Re: generic call backs Message-ID: <1994Sep28.121301.24095@penny.cs.fredonia.edu> Sender: news@penny.cs.fredonia.edu (News Administrator) Organization: Math / CS, State Univ. of N. Y. College at Fredonia X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: Date: Wed, 28 Sep 1994 12:13:01 GMT Date: 1994-09-28T12:13:01+00:00 List-Id: Ewan Benson (benson@felixstowe.em.slb.com) wrote: : He has two packages A and B : Package A contains a 'with B' : Package B contains a call to a subroutine in A, but for his own reasons he : does not want to use a 'with B' in package A. He's convinced it can be done : but can't find any info in his Booch reference. Under VAX Ada, you can have circular with statments, but to compile, you must load one into the library (load only does a syntax check I think), then do a recompile. By the way what kinda set up are you working under??? -- / \ | \\ | | Kevin V. Sobilo \\ | | sobi0268@mary.cs.fredonia.edu \\ // "Only Amiga Makes | | \\// It Possible" | | \/ | | "When the only tool you have is a hammer, | | everything begins to look like a nail." | | - Lotfi Zadeh - | | | | "BEWARE OF BURPS WITH CHASERS" | \==========================================================================/