From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a371455dc43f288d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-22 12:44:24 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!abg
From: abg@sei.cmu.edu (Anthony Gargaro)
Subject: Re: DSB Report (formerly: ARPA/SEI WWW server barely mentions Ada)
Message-ID: <1994Sep22.134410.8864@sei.cmu.edu>
Sender: netnews@sei.cmu.edu (Netnews)
Organization: The Software Engineering Institute
References: <CwJ7Kx.78C@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 13:44:10 EDT
Date: 1994-09-22T13:44:10-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <CwJ7Kx.78C@world.std.com>, srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes:

|> Nowhere on their nodes is Ada mentioned, much like their leader's
|> inability to include Ada in the Defense Science Board report.

Defense Science Board Task Force
on Acquiring Defense Software Commercially (June 1994)

Executive Summary

DoD should work to make necessary changes to acquisition regulations such as:

Not requiring c-level specifications for software projects developed in Ada.