From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c98dd3fd5aba8f78 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-16 23:42:25 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!yeshua.marcam.com!uunet!psinntp!ocsystems!kdh From: kdh@ocsystems.com (Kevin D. Heatwole) Subject: Re: CAUTION: Network Police patrolling c.l.a Message-ID: <1994Sep16.073406.11567@ocsystems.com> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 1994 07:34:06 GMT References: Organization: OC Systems, Inc. Date: 1994-09-16T07:34:06+00:00 List-Id: John R. Cobarruvias (cobarruvias@asd1.jsc.nasa.gov ) writes: > In article <354h7k$t19@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) > wrote: > > > John could you elaborate on your highly mysterious message, or was > > it just meant to be provocative? :-) > > In short: My opinions are different from someone else. So they took it upon > themselves to contact my supervisor. My supervisor had a talk with me. > > So, bottom line is: If you have a different opinion, then you too may get a > call from your supervisor. I think it is pathetic. I had a similar experience within the last month. Seems like some people on this newsgroup feel obligated to suppress opinions and discussion that they don't want the rest of us to consider. So be it ... Kevin D. Heatwole OC Systems, Inc.