From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e595f026ba3623cf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-14 11:32:30 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!billk
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: 1995 DOD SBIR very barely mentions Ada
Message-ID: <1994Oct13.112151.74806@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
From: billk@cs.ukans.edu (Bill Kinnersley)
Date: 13 Oct 94 11:21:50 CDT
References: <CxIMHA.5F2@world.std.com>
Organization: EECS Dept, University of Kansas
Nntp-Posting-Host: mars.cs.ukans.edu
Date: 1994-10-13T11:21:50-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <CxIMHA.5F2@world.std.com>,
Gregory Aharonian <srctran@world.std.com> wrote:
:
:    Once again, the DoD sends out a clear signal about its apathy towards Ada.
:
<Yawn>  Apathy just doesn't seem to excite me any more.


-- 
--Bill Kinnersley
  billk@cs.ukans.edu
226 Transfer complete.