From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,97208961a4b424a7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-03 05:24:13 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!ix.netcom.com!netcomsv!butch!rapnet.sanders.lockheed.com!rapnet.sanders.lockheed.com!gamache
From: gamache@rapnet.sanders.lockheed.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada /= ADA, Mac /= MAC, C++ /= CPLUSPLUS, etc.
Date: 3 Nov 94 08:24:13 -500
Organization: Lockheed Sanders, Inc.
Message-ID: <1994Nov3.082413.1@rapnet.sanders.lockheed.com>
References: <38v15f$no6@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dune.sanders.lockheed.com
Date: 1994-11-03T08:24:13-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <38v15f$no6@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>, 
Alexy.V.Khrabrov@dartmouth.edu (Alexy V. Khrabrov) writes:
> That's it. I never saw a message with ADA in it which was an
> "intermediary/advanced" Ada thought. One thing which makes Ada
> different is readability, which is a bit of aesthetics, and Mac is a
> similar artistic thing in systems. Another good system was Intel 432.
> BTW, who works with Intel iAPX 432 now? I think it's a pity that it
> gave birth to i386..., while the Ada-based OS is forgotten. How nice it
> would be to have a native AdaOS (seize the name! free :-). 


Someone from Intel may wish to comment, but the 432 did not give birth to
the i386.  To the best of my knowledge it was shelved until such time as 
reduced implementation geometries allowed successful repackaging -> this
repackaging is currently known as the Intel's i960 product family.  It is
used in alot of products like laser printers....


-----------------------------------------------------------------
with Standard_Disclaimer;
with Team_Ada;
use Team_Ada;