From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9437255512fc91f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-09 12:46:31 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!zib-berlin.de!prise.nz.dlr.de!news.dfn.de!gina.zfn.uni-bremen.de!marvin.pc-labor.uni-bremen.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.belwue.de!fht-mannheim!roxi.rz.fht-mannheim.de!duz From: duz@roxi.rz.fht-mannheim.de (Dirk Zoller) Subject: Re: PM bindings for OS/2 gnat? References: <3brftn$gcb@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> Sender: news@roxi.rz.fht-mannheim.de (NEWS - system account) Organization: Fachhochschule fuer Technik, Mannheim (FRG) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 94 19:21:02 CET X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Message-ID: <1994Dec9.192102.30507@roxi.rz.fht-mannheim.de> Date: 1994-12-09T19:21:02+01:00 List-Id: David Weller (dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM) wrote: : Definitely! I'm becoming convinced that us OS/2 folks should nudge : the NYU folks to move over to EMX. But what is the currently used GNU-C for GNAT on OS/2? I was quite surprised that the gnat-Package seems to contain a complete GNU-C too. This caused problems with the PATH. Setting it in CONFIG.SYS requires a decision if GNAT or emx is to be used. So if there are no reasons for sticking to the presently used port, I for one would appreciate a switch to emx. Dirk --- duz@roxi.rz.fht-mannheim.de