From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df52cf364e9edc0a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-06 16:35:59 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!abg
From: abg@sei.cmu.edu (Anthony Gargaro)
Subject: Re: Is DoD simulation ignoring using Ada?????
Message-ID: <1994Dec6.181221.10672@sei.cmu.edu>
Sender: netnews@sei.cmu.edu (Netnews)
Organization: The Software Engineering Institute
References: <D0DGF8.IGJ@world.std.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 1994 18:12:21 EST
Date: 1994-12-06T18:12:21-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <D0DGF8.IGJ@world.std.com>, srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes:
|> 
|>      To what extent are DoD modelling and simulation efforts being encouraged
|> to do their work in Ada?  Based on general DoD behavior in the past, probably
|> not much, and based on studies of DoD simulation publications, apparently not
|> much.
|> 

Here are two data points that you may find helpful.

The U.S. Army Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation Command (STRICOM)
WARFIGHTERS' Simulation (WARSIM) 2000 procurement requires the use of Ada 9X
(ISO 8652:1995).

The U.S. Air Force Aeronautical Systems Center for Simulations and Trainers
(ASC/YT) Structural Modeling Guidebook exemplars all use Ada.


\"""/ -- Anthony Gargaro                 E-Mail: abg@sei.cmu.edu -- \"""/
(###) -- SEI Resident Affiliate          Tel No: 1 412.268.5780  -- (###)
~`|'~ -- Computer Sciences Corporation   Fax No: 1 412.268.5758  -- ~`|'~