From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 9 Sep 93 17:14:30 GMT
From: rational.com!geneo@uunet.uu.net  (Gene Ouye)
Subject: Re: TRI-Ada '94 Topics
Message-ID: <1993Sep9.171430.27936@rational.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I (geneo@Rational.COM) wrote:

: I second this.  I would love to hear objective, business-case discussions
: on why an organization chose Ada over C++ without any "just pick Ada cuz
: C++ sucks and anyone who uses it must be a hack that only uses unsafe and
: intentionally obscure constructs" diatribe.

Following up my own post, I would also like to hear the converse of the
above, ie, _objective_ (no pun intended ;-), business-case discussions on
why an organization chose C++ over Ada, (again, without any anti-Ada
diatribe).

(PLEASE, NO FLAME-WARS NOW!!!)

--
Gene Ouye (geneo@rational.com)   Rational, Bethesda, MD
(301) 897-4014