From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 21 Sep 93 16:01:20 GMT
From: butch!enterprise!news@uunet.uu.net  (Barry Schiff)
Subject: Re: Current state of Ada 9X compilers...?
Message-ID: <1993Sep21.160120.25759@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>   In article <1993Sep18.163712.8933@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> blaak@csri.toron
to.edu (Raymond Blaak) writes:
>   >
>   >Ada 9X! Ada 9X! Ada 9X! The interest is off the scale.
>   >
>   >Cheers,
>   >Ray
>   >blaak@csri.toronto.edu
>   >
>   >P.S. The GNAT project may just be the best thing that has happened for Ada
.
>
>   Ok, we have one strong vote of interest. Any others? ;-)

Another YES YES YES vote for 9X and the GNAT project.