From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 13 Sep 93 01:20:07 GMT
From: magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!ajpo.sei.cmu.edu!wellerd@uunet
.uu.net  (David Weller)
Subject: Re: C++ rumour
Message-ID: <1993Sep12.212007.15540@sei.cmu.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <CD7M7E.DI@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk (Charles Lindsey) 
writes:
>
>This might amuse some Ada fans.
>
>I just heard a rumour that, in the U.K., the Ministry of Defence does not
>now allow contractors to write programs in C++, on the grounds that there is
>too much scope for obscure and unexpected effects.
>

Well, in the US, our Department of Defense has the same rule.  They just
forgot to tell anybody :-)

-- 
type My_Disclaimer is new Standard.Disclaimer with record
	AJPO, SEI : Cognizance := Disavow_All_Knowledge;
end record;--)