From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 28 May 93 01:31:49 GMT
From: seas.gwu.edu!mfeldman@uunet.uu.net  (Michael Feldman)
Subject: Re: interesting thread on comp.edu
Message-ID: <1993May28.013149.8356@seas.gwu.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <C7p10q.xn@mcc.com> breland@mcc.com writes:
>In article 11713@seas.gwu.edu, mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) writes:
>>
>>A comment was made that a language should provide unsage stuff, but with 
>                                                   ^^^^^^
>>safe alternatives, and done in a way so as to be sure that programmers
>>know they are using the unsafe stuff. The poster said that C++ is
>>"evolving" in this direction. I resisted the temptation to say how
>>delighted I was that C++ is finally evolving, in this area, to where
>>Ada was 10 years ago.
>
>Do I detect something Freudian here?  ;)
>
I KNEW this would happen, the minute I committed the "send" command.
Yeah, a Freudian flip.

Mike