From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 18 May 93 15:47:55 GMT
From: aio!usenet@ames.arc.nasa.gov  (John Cobarruvias)
Subject: Re: Yet another example of failure of a language
Message-ID: <1993May18.154755.3726@aio.jsc.nasa.gov>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <118@mlb.win.net> mbayern@mlb.win.net (Mark Bayern) writes:
> 
>>In INFO-ADA Digest V93 #271, g_harrison@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
>>   (George C. Harrison, Norfolk State University) said" 
>>
>>>... maybe we need to encourage Computer Language Magazine to have an 
>>>annual Ada issue.
>>
>>Too late, I'm afraid, as Computer Language has just gone under.  This
>>is obviously due to their continued emphasis on C and C++ programming,
>>
>
>Sorry, but they've haven't 'gone under'.  They have changed the
>name of the mag to Structured Design, and changed from a
>subscription mag, to a circulation-controlled mag.  Which means
>that I'll get it for free, but others won't be able to buy it on
>the newstand.
>
>Will they write about Ada?  I doubt it, the last two issues of CLM
>included neat things like splitting languages into 'procedural' or
>'object oriented', and then listing Ada in the procedural language
>category.  Oh well ....
>
>Mark
>
> 
>
>