From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7992c59d4c134e9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-23 15:24:29 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.ans.net!cmcl2!psinntp!psinntp!intrepid!gary From: gary@intrepid.com (Gary Funck) Subject: Re: The Economist says: US Military software in 8th place Organization: Intrepid Technology, Inc. Distribution: comp.lang.ada,comp.software-eng Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1993 16:07:06 GMT Message-ID: <1993Mar23.160706.22329@intrepid.com> References: Date: 1993-03-23T16:07:06+00:00 List-Id: In article srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes: > ... > TABLE OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PRODUCTIVITY (1991) > > MIS SOFTWARE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE MILITARY SOFTWARE > >1 America Japan France >2 France America Israel >3 Britain Germany South Korea >4 Canada France Britain >5 Switzerland Britain Germany >6 Germany India Sweden >7 Japan Taiwan Italy >8 Norway South Korea AMERICA >9 Sweden Holland Brazil >10 India Sweden Egypt > France, Germany, Sweden, and Britain all use Ada much more extensively than the US. They also seem somehow more serious than the US at building truly reliable/useable things. And they seem more comfortable with Ada. Perhaps their early adoption of Algol, followed by Pascal laid the groundwork. So if the problem isn't Ada, then what is the problem? -- | Gary Funck gary@intrepid.com [uunet!uupsi!intrepid!gary] | Intrepid Technology Inc., Mountain View CA (415) 964-8135 --