From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7251fa99aab97e06
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-12 21:49:33 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 sparky!uunet!gatech!udel!bogus.sura.net!darwin.sura.net!seas.gwu.edu!mfeldman
From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
Subject: Re: Ichibah flames, and flames out over, Ada 9X
Message-ID: <1993Mar12.235410.8472@seas.gwu.edu>
Sender: news@seas.gwu.edu
Organization: George Washington University
References: <1993Mar9.152454.739@sei.cmu.edu>
 <1993Mar9.210350.14567@seas.gwu.edu>
 <1993Mar12.144940.18386@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1993 23:54:10 GMT
Date: 1993-03-12T23:54:10+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1993Mar12.144940.18386@inmet.camb.inmet.com> stt@spock.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) writes:

[stuff deleted]
>
>John Barnes is working on the 9X Rationale these days,
>with help from other members of the Mapping/Revision Team.  
>Some version of the rationale will accompany the documents
>circulated for ANSI Canvass/ISO balloting.
>
A Rationale is fine, but the original question asked about the promise
of _primers_ written to _teach_ 9X. This has been promised in the last few
versions of the transition plan. Is this happening? (I can tell you for sure
that nobody has asked _me_ to write it :-))

Mike Feldman