From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 6 Jun 93 03:18:58 GMT
From: dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.
net!seas.gwu.edu!mfeldman@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU  (Michael Feldman)
Subject: Re: Non-defense Ada applications - answering several requests
Message-ID: <1993Jun6.031858.3366@seas.gwu.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <conn.739334028@wuarchive.wustl.edu> conn@wuarchive.wustl.edu (Richa
rd Conn) writes:

[stuff deleted]
>
>Consequently, proprietary nondisclosure can, and has, covered
>everything.

Naturally. But the suggestion was only that the question be asked.
There may be companies that really don't need to keep their use of Ada
a secret _per se_, they just never thought to publicize it.

It's worth a shot, I think.

Mike