From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 26 Jul 93 15:51:51 GMT
From: cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!ajpo.sei.cmu.edu!wellerd@ucbvax.Berke
ley.EDU  (David Weller)
Subject: Re: Anyone else actually like Ada?
Message-ID: <1993Jul26.115151.25344@sei.cmu.edu>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <230ni6$eo0@truffula.fp.trw.com> erwin@trwacs.fp.trw.com (Harry Erwi
n) writes:
>>[Various application areas of Ada listed]
>
>But those are the sorts of applications Ada was specifically designed for.
>People -->should<-- be using Ada there. But they should not be using Ada
>for applications where a fully object-oriented design approach is
>appropriate (test software, simulations, operating systems, more
>generally, message passing systems).
>
>Cheers,
Boy, am I ashamed!  Here I am, building a large scale, object-oriented
simulation system, using message passing and doing OS work (RMS
scheduling, resource allocation, message routing), and all in that
*@#$ Ada language.  

Am I doing something wrong? :-)


-- 
type My_Disclaimer is new Standard.Disclaimer with record
	AJPO, SEI : Cognizance := Disavow_All_Knowledge;
end record;--)