From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Date: 17 Feb 93 16:46:10 GMT From: agate!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-stat e.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!ajpo.sei.cmu.edu!progers@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Pat Roger s) Subject: productivity references & data Message-ID: <1993Feb17.114610.25341@sei.cmu.edu> List-Id: We need to supply "proof" that the standard 10 lines per day for debugged, tested and *documented* code is real -- or incorrect, and what the number really should be, if incorrect. Anybody have good data or references? For that matter, where did I get the idea that 10/day isthe so-called standard? (We do better, but that isn't the issue.) Thanks in advance, Pat progers@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu